Taken with my trusty pentax KX and a trusty Super MC Takumar 50mm f1.4
I missed the amber and pink sunset last night, so i vowed to take my camera to work :)
this was the best shot of the 2 dozen i got of tonights sunset
laterz
Showing posts with label 50mm. Show all posts
Showing posts with label 50mm. Show all posts
Thursday, February 10, 2011
Saturday, February 5, 2011
The answer is: Alienskins exposure 3 plugin for photoshop
I keep getting the itch to try film again, then i remember how unwieldy and wasteful it was, every shot basically costs 30 cents and you have to wait until you get it developed . Saying that, the quality is perfect if the shot comes out nicely , if it doesnt.........well then too bad :)
The photo I posted yesterday was edited with a filter pack trial from this company
http://www.alienskin.com/exposure/index.aspx
they have a few hundred filters that were custommade by various photographer to emulate everything from ilford B+W to Fuji Velvia 50 slide film ( complete with a gran/no grain option!)
here is a quick photo that was taken witha modern lens, a pentax FA50/1.4 autofocus one , it has the exact same optical formula as the Super Takumar 50/1.4 series, that you can see from the out of focus smooth bokeh
The photo I posted yesterday was edited with a filter pack trial from this company
http://www.alienskin.com/exposure/index.aspx
they have a few hundred filters that were custommade by various photographer to emulate everything from ilford B+W to Fuji Velvia 50 slide film ( complete with a gran/no grain option!)
here is a quick photo that was taken witha modern lens, a pentax FA50/1.4 autofocus one , it has the exact same optical formula as the Super Takumar 50/1.4 series, that you can see from the out of focus smooth bokeh
Friday, February 4, 2011
1954 Carl zeiss jena Tessar 50/2.8: When is film not film?
its a 1954 Carl Zeiss Jena 50mm /2.8 Tessar (that I got for super cheap as it has a few dings in it,) and I took this nice sunset shot using Fuji Provia , the old film , or is it?
Ill leave this up for a day and see if anyone can figure out the trick :)
Wednesday, February 2, 2011
Contax Carl Zeiss T* Planar 50/1,7: the Sharpest 50mm ever?
someone asked me what some of these lenses look like, so here is a shot I took today of the long named:
" Contax Carl Zeiss T* Planar 50mm f1.7 MMJ" phew, say that 9 times fast!
This lens is interesting and also cool for a few reasons
1: A lens built in Japan ( the J in MMJ) by Kyocera for Contax under license from Carl Zeiss
2: Contax /Yashica mount, named bacause it was used for 2 brands of lenses, the contax one here and also the lesser quality ( some say equal) Yashica lenses that can be bought for about 1/4 the price of these Zeiss ones , but they use the Zeiss technological input
3: Its a 50mm 1.7 lens, and is one of the rare lenses that is sharp at its widest aperture ( 1.7) a lot of lenses are incredibly fast , but when they are wide open youget a lot of chromatic aberration, or fringing , or the lens is just plain soft. This lens is sharp, has a tiny bit of purple fringing if the light hits the lens just so, and for CA I coudlnt see any of note . It is also regarded by some people to be one of the, if not THE sharpest 50mm lens ever made, but that is highly debated all over the net , google it and see
For this shot: ISO 800 and taken with my new 50mm f1.4 FA Pentax lens on my KX, and I already think its not as sharp as my Takumar 50/1.4 , but I need to do some more testing on it. It was placed on a C/Y>EOS adapter and lit by 2 x 100W spotlights inside a homemade lightbox on a piece of black polished slate
" Contax Carl Zeiss T* Planar 50mm f1.7 MMJ" phew, say that 9 times fast!
This lens is interesting and also cool for a few reasons
1: A lens built in Japan ( the J in MMJ) by Kyocera for Contax under license from Carl Zeiss
2: Contax /Yashica mount, named bacause it was used for 2 brands of lenses, the contax one here and also the lesser quality ( some say equal) Yashica lenses that can be bought for about 1/4 the price of these Zeiss ones , but they use the Zeiss technological input
3: Its a 50mm 1.7 lens, and is one of the rare lenses that is sharp at its widest aperture ( 1.7) a lot of lenses are incredibly fast , but when they are wide open youget a lot of chromatic aberration, or fringing , or the lens is just plain soft. This lens is sharp, has a tiny bit of purple fringing if the light hits the lens just so, and for CA I coudlnt see any of note . It is also regarded by some people to be one of the, if not THE sharpest 50mm lens ever made, but that is highly debated all over the net , google it and see
For this shot: ISO 800 and taken with my new 50mm f1.4 FA Pentax lens on my KX, and I already think its not as sharp as my Takumar 50/1.4 , but I need to do some more testing on it. It was placed on a C/Y>EOS adapter and lit by 2 x 100W spotlights inside a homemade lightbox on a piece of black polished slate
Saturday, January 29, 2011
Super Takumar 50/1.4 : Miso Soup for the soul
Continuing with my theme of food establishment fotos, I took my eldest daughter to the local authentic sushi bar , well I guess she took me because I wanted to go to the coffee place :)
We had a 24 piece party pack of sushi and maki and it was delicious except for the miso soup which I didnt like ( she didnt either) being a kid she got away with " I dont like it" and I had to make do with " I left some in the bowl so I can take some photos of it ":)
Im trying something new that I learned on another site , Thorsten Overgaards excellent site . For outdoors Im using ISO 100 for indoors ISO 800 , and I am also trying to use the lenses as close to wide open as possible , so this shot is:
Pentax KX with 1971 Asahi Pentax Takumar 50/1.4 @ 1.4 ISO 800 and shutter speed of 1/60 second. The in-body IS ability of the KX is a godsend for these type of shots , and I also found that the density of the Takumar makes the camera really easy to hold steady as it ends up being well balanced. full size here
I mostly took this shot as I noticed the crazy bokeh of the spotlights in the restaurant , and I cheated alittle by sliding my bowl directly underneath one of them !
later , now Im hungry, just not for Miso
We had a 24 piece party pack of sushi and maki and it was delicious except for the miso soup which I didnt like ( she didnt either) being a kid she got away with " I dont like it" and I had to make do with " I left some in the bowl so I can take some photos of it ":)
Im trying something new that I learned on another site , Thorsten Overgaards excellent site . For outdoors Im using ISO 100 for indoors ISO 800 , and I am also trying to use the lenses as close to wide open as possible , so this shot is:
Pentax KX with 1971 Asahi Pentax Takumar 50/1.4 @ 1.4 ISO 800 and shutter speed of 1/60 second. The in-body IS ability of the KX is a godsend for these type of shots , and I also found that the density of the Takumar makes the camera really easy to hold steady as it ends up being well balanced. full size here
I mostly took this shot as I noticed the crazy bokeh of the spotlights in the restaurant , and I cheated alittle by sliding my bowl directly underneath one of them !
later , now Im hungry, just not for Miso
Saturday, January 22, 2011
DDR Pentacon 50/1.8 : bargain lenses part V
Here is another inexpensive gem for a M42 lens, the East German Pentacon 50/1.8 , it appears to be similar to a carl Zeiss lens, but instead of costing 250+ you can find them on ebay for 30-50 dollars!
I think Pentacon was a conglomerate of optics manufacturers that was created in the 40s/50s in East Germany from a lot of the smaller businesses that were still around after WW2 , but I am not 100% sure about that . The lens I have is well made , and all metal and it feels really dense, Ill have to do some research to see what its construction internally is, because it feels like it has a lot of glass in there. Focusing is smooth and its called a 50/1.8 MC so I assume its multi coated , but again Im not sure. All I know is , it takes very pleasing shots and it can focus very close, about 30 cm , which is almost macro territory!
This is a shot taken in my computer room using the M42 adapter on my Pentax KX , and its my daughters curly hair , I was so close the depth of field is razor thin, but as you can see, parts of the strands are in focus and are quite well defined , this was wide open at 1.8 and using ambient light, so as usual, a shot I took for a goof ended up being a keeper , I should rely on my instinct more often and not try and force creativity
laterz
I think Pentacon was a conglomerate of optics manufacturers that was created in the 40s/50s in East Germany from a lot of the smaller businesses that were still around after WW2 , but I am not 100% sure about that . The lens I have is well made , and all metal and it feels really dense, Ill have to do some research to see what its construction internally is, because it feels like it has a lot of glass in there. Focusing is smooth and its called a 50/1.8 MC so I assume its multi coated , but again Im not sure. All I know is , it takes very pleasing shots and it can focus very close, about 30 cm , which is almost macro territory!
This is a shot taken in my computer room using the M42 adapter on my Pentax KX , and its my daughters curly hair , I was so close the depth of field is razor thin, but as you can see, parts of the strands are in focus and are quite well defined , this was wide open at 1.8 and using ambient light, so as usual, a shot I took for a goof ended up being a keeper , I should rely on my instinct more often and not try and force creativity
laterz
Friday, January 21, 2011
Pentax Takumar 50mm/f1.4 : A very Smooootth bokeh
One of the reasons I like these primes is that invariably they have excellent optics for a fraction of the price of a new lens , this is taken in the coffee shop ( I really do have other pictures!) and i focused too short on purpose and in Lightroom i adjusted the white balance ( maladjusted actually) to tungsten instead of fluorescent because I like blue and it accentuated the blue glow from the reflections from the microwave
The only thing I really had to change was the noise in the image, the Pentax KX takes really good JPGs but I am now using mostly RAW as the vintages lenses have a tendency to over or underexpose depending on the f-stop used ( no correction inside the camera like the fancy new lenses) and i found that trying to add 2 stops to a jpg ended up with banding
The plus side is that when you use higher ISO settings, the RAW files actually look like film grain, so it fits perfectly my *vision* of what i wanted to accomplish with this project, shoot filmic imagery without using film :)
ISO 800 wide open at F1.4 focused about 1 metre before the object , and hand held , the body image stabilisation is a godsend!
The only thing I really had to change was the noise in the image, the Pentax KX takes really good JPGs but I am now using mostly RAW as the vintages lenses have a tendency to over or underexpose depending on the f-stop used ( no correction inside the camera like the fancy new lenses) and i found that trying to add 2 stops to a jpg ended up with banding
The plus side is that when you use higher ISO settings, the RAW files actually look like film grain, so it fits perfectly my *vision* of what i wanted to accomplish with this project, shoot filmic imagery without using film :)
ISO 800 wide open at F1.4 focused about 1 metre before the object , and hand held , the body image stabilisation is a godsend!
Thursday, January 20, 2011
Pentax Takumar 50mm/f1.4 : How good is it in low light?
One of the main reasons I like the older Prime lenses it that they have excellent optics and invariably they are VERY fast . This helps me in a few ways as first of all I dont like using flash too much on my family as we are very pale and a flash makes us look like twilight fans.
Second of all, a wide open aperture thats under F2.0 has a razor thin depth of field that works great for portraiture as it can isolate your subject easier to cut out background or foreground clutter in the case to the left
I took this inside a dimly lit coffee shop on an overcast day in january using ISO 800 and f1.4 wide open on my Super MC Takumar 50/1.4 , the Pentax KX body has really good higher ISO capabilities, and 800 is as good as 200 on my rebel XT , but the KX is 7 years newer :)
As you can see from the shot , my daughters eyes and face are in focus and everything else is blurred, but not blurry to the point of annoyance, I find it actually quite a pleasing effect as the blur is subtle and smooth
the only reason I converted it to Black and White was I thought the tones and contrast looked better in B+W as opposed to colour :)
bye for now
Second of all, a wide open aperture thats under F2.0 has a razor thin depth of field that works great for portraiture as it can isolate your subject easier to cut out background or foreground clutter in the case to the left
I took this inside a dimly lit coffee shop on an overcast day in january using ISO 800 and f1.4 wide open on my Super MC Takumar 50/1.4 , the Pentax KX body has really good higher ISO capabilities, and 800 is as good as 200 on my rebel XT , but the KX is 7 years newer :)
As you can see from the shot , my daughters eyes and face are in focus and everything else is blurred, but not blurry to the point of annoyance, I find it actually quite a pleasing effect as the blur is subtle and smooth
the only reason I converted it to Black and White was I thought the tones and contrast looked better in B+W as opposed to colour :)
bye for now
Friday, January 14, 2011
The Japanese leica lens: Super Multi Coated takumar 50mm/1.4
Ahhh , now we are talking epic vintage lenses, and affordable too . In the 50s after the korean war, the UN troops were quite taken by the quality of the japanese optics, as they were as good as the German gear , but at a lesser cost , after a while the Japanese really came into their own, and one of the forerunners was Asahi Optical , which became pentax after the style of their cameras PENtaprism conTAX , the Pentax brand became so well known that they changed from Asahi Optical to Pentax Cameras I believe
Enough history, what I have is one of the best regarded Pentax lenses the Super Multi Coated Takumar 50mm/1,4 , I have a few takumars that I use on a regular basis , but the 50mm is my go to, I have shot a wedding with it, quite a few portraits, landscape , candids etc, all came out better than I expected , this lens is very clear , and sharp and optically to get the same quality in a modern AF lens you would spend over 1200 dollars , and this can be had for around 100 , but the secret is out and the prices are rising rapidly due to the Canon 5/7D video gang , the 7 glass elements are well made and the outer body is metal, so the lens is dense, and very solid .
If you are used to modern plasticy autofocus enses, the first time you pick up a Takumar it feels like you are holding a hand grenade, a hand grenade of awesome! What Asahi's design mantra atthe time was to create a lens that was better than zeiss of Leica, and they achieved pretty much that ideal, in the 60s this lens was $199 and i read somewhere that they took a loss on every one they made until the manufacturing process became less expensive , to convert that, $199 in the 60s is about $2000 now!
This shot was taken at night time using my pentax KX using the official m42>PK adapter from the pentax site, it was 30 dollars and it lets my KX use ANY pentax lens made from the mid 50s until today ! Adapter info I stepped the lens down to f4 so the OOF highlights would be octagonal as it has 8 blades inside, it came out nicer than I thought, and here is the full size version full size : click on original
Enough history, what I have is one of the best regarded Pentax lenses the Super Multi Coated Takumar 50mm/1,4 , I have a few takumars that I use on a regular basis , but the 50mm is my go to, I have shot a wedding with it, quite a few portraits, landscape , candids etc, all came out better than I expected , this lens is very clear , and sharp and optically to get the same quality in a modern AF lens you would spend over 1200 dollars , and this can be had for around 100 , but the secret is out and the prices are rising rapidly due to the Canon 5/7D video gang , the 7 glass elements are well made and the outer body is metal, so the lens is dense, and very solid .
If you are used to modern plasticy autofocus enses, the first time you pick up a Takumar it feels like you are holding a hand grenade, a hand grenade of awesome! What Asahi's design mantra atthe time was to create a lens that was better than zeiss of Leica, and they achieved pretty much that ideal, in the 60s this lens was $199 and i read somewhere that they took a loss on every one they made until the manufacturing process became less expensive , to convert that, $199 in the 60s is about $2000 now!
This shot was taken at night time using my pentax KX using the official m42>PK adapter from the pentax site, it was 30 dollars and it lets my KX use ANY pentax lens made from the mid 50s until today ! Adapter info I stepped the lens down to f4 so the OOF highlights would be octagonal as it has 8 blades inside, it came out nicer than I thought, and here is the full size version full size : click on original
Sunday, January 9, 2011
Carl Zeiss Planar T* 50mm/1,7 : Wide open!
I managed to find a CZ T* Planar 50mm for a really good price , 200 dollars canadian , with caps and a UV filter, it is MINT , but unfortunately for me, it is in the Contax/yashica mount which doesnt work with my preferred Pentax KX.
So I had to break out my old ( 2003) Canon Rebel XT ( EOS 350) and use that instead, so I pop the lens on , take a few shots and uploaded them to the PC , this one came out really nice,its shot at f1.7 and is the last vestiges of sunlight streaming through the blinds to my computer room, quite sharp for wide open.
I did some research and on some sites the Planar 50/1,7 is regarded by some as one of the sharpest 50mms ever made, and it definitely has a beautiful build quality , the focus is silky smooth, the only downside is that now I have 2 camera bodies and the only reason for keeping the Rebel is to use the planars :(
So I had to break out my old ( 2003) Canon Rebel XT ( EOS 350) and use that instead, so I pop the lens on , take a few shots and uploaded them to the PC , this one came out really nice,its shot at f1.7 and is the last vestiges of sunlight streaming through the blinds to my computer room, quite sharp for wide open.
I did some research and on some sites the Planar 50/1,7 is regarded by some as one of the sharpest 50mms ever made, and it definitely has a beautiful build quality , the focus is silky smooth, the only downside is that now I have 2 camera bodies and the only reason for keeping the Rebel is to use the planars :(
Saturday, January 8, 2011
Sunrise with 1954 CZ Jena tessar 50mm f2.8
This was the only bright part of the day, the sunrise peeked under the overcast for less than 5 minutes, so I was outside with my KX and the Carl Zeiss Tessar lens I have that cost me 40 dollars off a guy in Greece. I did the post processing while listening to Vangelis' Blade Runner soundtrack, so perhaps thats why I made it in an anamorphic aspect ratio
The lens is single coated and prone to flare, but I like it , and I dont know why,but it has a great rendering that the more modern lenses dont do, is it more contrast? less definition? I dont know , but it was made when black and white photography was the norm, so when used to take colour, it seems to really generate excellent images
The lens is single coated and prone to flare, but I like it , and I dont know why,but it has a great rendering that the more modern lenses dont do, is it more contrast? less definition? I dont know , but it was made when black and white photography was the norm, so when used to take colour, it seems to really generate excellent images
Labels:
50mm,
anamorphic,
jena,
kx,
tessar,
zeiss,
zeiss jena tessar
Friday, January 7, 2011
Ray of Gold : Super MC Takumar 50/1.4
| Ray of Gold |
On the way back to the car during an evening photo trip the golden sunset was almost done,but a ray of light shone through the forest and landed on this leaf , so I took a picture of it naturally :)
I like this lens, even if it is a bit yellowed with age , the thorium coating causes the cement inside to discolour over time!
Thursday, January 6, 2011
Bokeh Christmas tree! Takumar 50mm /f1.4

Super Multi Coated Asahi-Pentax Takumar 50mm f1.4 at f1.4 on my Pentax KX
I had the lens wide open to get the circular highlights, if you stop it down below F2 it turns them into octagons, and by f4 they are perfectly symmetrical . Quite cool!
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)
